CO129-512-5 Boxer Indemnity Settlement 21-5-1929 - 21-5-1929 — Page 82

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

>9

is at the moment no satisfactory alternative to the policy of financial co-operation (with America, Japan and France) in China such as might justify our withdrawing from the Consor tium Agreement.

That these considerations make it insdvisable for us

to insist on an absolute monopoly for Great Britain of all

orders placed from the Indemnity funda.

4. That, spart from this, we should do our very best to get orders from these funds for British firms, but that this

can better be done through personal relations on the spot than

by paper agreements, such as the Chinese are very adept at

@vading »

5. That, as regards the Reiss, Massey contract, the

Governor of Hongkong's recommendation was based on inadequate

knowledge, and that no encouragemont can be given to it, since

it appears to be contrary to existing obligations.

6 That if the Chinese do succeed in evading the Con-

sortium, we must ourselves be in a position to prove to our

Consortium partners that this is due to no encouragement en

our part and that we have derived no exclusive profits there-

from.

FOREIGN OFFICE.

July 1st, 1929.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.